26May2019

A call to ban creationism in British schools

UK Flag

Creationism is the religious belief that humanity, life, the Earth, and the universe are the creation of a supernatural being. As science developed from the 18th century onwards, various views developed which aimed to reconcile science with the Genesis creation narrative.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism)

A group of scientists in the United Kingdom is calling for a “statutory and enforceable” ban on teaching creationism in Britain’s publicly funded schools, as well as for evolution to be included “at both primary and secondary levels in the National Curriculum and in all schools.” Among the signatories to the statement are David Attenborough, Richard Dawkins, Steve Jones, Harold Kroto, Paul Nurse (the president of the Royal Society of London), Michael Reiss, and Lewis Wolpert, as well as the Association for Science Education, the British Humanist Association, the British Science Association, the Campaign for Science and Engineering, and Ekklesia.

The statement appears on a website, Evolution not Creationism, aimed at driving out creationism and intelligent design from classrooms and marks the latest attempt to reinforce evolution teaching in classrooms. Professor Richard Dawkins, president of the Royal Society Sir Paul Nurse, neurobiologist Professor Colin Blakemore and theoretical physicist Jim Al-Khalili are among the other signatories.

In 2009, an Ipsos Mori survey found that more than half of British adults think that intelligent design and creationism should be taught alongside evolution in school science lessons – a proportion higher than in the US.

In 2007, after a series of controversies about the place of creationism in the science classroom in Britain, the Department for Children, Schools, and Families issued “Guidance on the place of creationism and intelligent design in science lessons,” which stated, “Creationism and intelligent design are sometimes claimed to be scientific theories. This is not the case as they have no underpinning scientific principles, or explanations, and are not accepted by the science community as a whole. Creationism and intelligent design therefore do not form part of the science National Curriculum programmes of study.”

But not all concerns were allayed. Creationist organizations such as Truth in Science and Creation Ministries International continued to circulate material to teachers and to present their views at schools. And according to the Guardian (September 19, 2011), “There is no definitive data on the number of UK schools which teach creationism. … A 2006 survey by Opinionpanel found that nearly 20% of UK students said they had been taught creationism as fact by their main school.” (Creationism was defined [PDF] in the Opinionpanel report as the view that “God created humans in their present form within the last 10,000 years.”)

Moreover, there were concerns that “free schools” — a relatively new phenomenon, resembling charter schools in the United States — planned to teach creationism. Although the Department for Children, Education, and Schools promised to reject any free school proposing to teach creationism in the science curriculum, the group of scientists calling for the ban observed that there is no way to keep the department to its promise or to ensure that a free school, once approved, would not change its mind and begin to teach creationism. Since such schools do not need to follow the National Curriculum, they could also neglect the teaching of evolution.

The call for the ban on teaching creationism is not without precedent. As NCSE reported in May 2011, a new campaign — Creationism In Schools Isn’t Science, or CrISIS — petitioned the government to enforce its stated position on the teaching of creationism, arguing, “that creationism should not be presented as a valid scientific position, nor creationist websites and resources be promoted, in publicly funded schools or in any youth activities run on publicly funded school premises.” Endorsed by the National Secular Society, Ekklesia, and the British Centre for Science Education, CrISIS garnered over 5000 signatures to its petition.

What Next?

Related Articles

14 Responses to "A call to ban creationism in British schools"

  1. Anonymous says:

    Good article , thanks and we would like more! Added to FeedBurner as well

  2. Anonymous says:

    Awesome article. Bookmarked on Delicious :)

  3. Anonymous says:

    Can I just say exactly what a relief to find this site and an individual who actually knows just what theyre talking about online. You definitely know the way to bring an issue to light and help it become important. More people need to read this and understand this side on the story.

  4. Anonymous says:

    Thanks so much for posting all of the good content! I am looking forward to reading more.

  5. Anonymous says:

    I’ve bookmarked, Digg, and I joined the RSS subscription. Thanks! .

  6. Anonymous says:

    Thanks for this good post, I am glad I discovered this web site on yahoo.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Nice article. I’ve been gratified, heading via your site’s posts. I shall sign to the RSS feed and should certainly wait around for another post. best Regards, Mateus

  8. Anonymous says:

    Good website! “Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself.” by Lois McMaster Bujold.

  9. Anonymous says:

    Great post!

  10. Anonymous says:

    Yay google is my queen assisted me to find this outstanding site! . “Universities incline wits to sophistry and affectation.” by Francis Bacon.

  11. Anonymous says:

    Exactly what I was searching for, thankyou for putting up. “There are many victories worse than a defeat.” by George Eliot.

  12. Anonymous says:

    I would just like to let you know how much I learn from your website Bookmarked book ; be back fast for some more good articles!

  13. Anonymous says:

    I believe other website proprietors should take this website as an example , very clean and great user genial style . “When we lose one blessing, another is often, most unexpectedly, given in its place.” by Clive Staples Lewis.

  14. Anonymous says:

    Nice commentary. last thirty times I uncovered this online internet internet site and desired to permit you be conscious that i’ve been gratified, heading by way of your site’s posts. I should undoubtedly be signing just as as a whole lot since the RSS feed and may wait around for yet another post. Cheers, Glen

Leave a Reply

You must be Logged in to post comment.